Certain states and cities are increasingly proclaiming themselves “Second Amendment sanctuaries,” but given we are all granted these rights within the United States of America, what does it mean to be a sanctuary?
Let’s start with defining the term. Generally, a 2nd Amendment sanctuary is a city, county, or other jurisdiction that has adopted a resolution declaring that restrictive gun control laws passed by a higher legislative body, such as the federal government or a state legislature, violate the Constitution and will not be enforced in that jurisdiction. These resolutions are intended to send a strong message to legislators that law-abiding gun owners, represented by their local governments, are opposed to such gun control measures.
Now, let’s take a closer look at these Second Amendment sanctuaries and why this trend is picking up steam across the nation.
A Growing Trend Across the U.S.
2nd Amendment sanctuaries have multiplied over the past few years. More than 1,200 jurisdictions in 37 states have adopted resolutions opposing the enforcement of state and federal laws that violates the Second Amendment. Sanctuaries are found across the nation, from Paris, Maine to Lake County, Florida; Needles, California to Kenai, Alaska.
Inspired by the recent expansion of the immigration sanctuary movement, law-abiding gun owners and their local governments saw the need to re-assert their Second Amendment rights. Many feel that current laws and pending legislation—ranging from universal background checks and magazine restrictions to extreme risk (“red flag”) orders—would infringe the individual’s constitutional right to bear arms. Years earlier, several states, including Alaska and Kansas, had passed resolutions declaring they would not comply with any federal gun laws they viewed as unconstitutional. These resolutions served as models for the Second Amendment sanctuary movement.
Committed gun owners can take the initiative to persuade local officials and policymakers to adopt Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions. For example, the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus provides recommended steps to accomplish this goal, including coordinating efforts with other gun activists, communicating with law enforcement and legislative officials to urge them to action, and attending public legislative sessions to present petitions calling for a sanctuary resolution.
Why the Trend to Second Amendment Sanctuaries Now?
Second Amendment sanctuaries are a direct response to other types of sanctuaries, particularly those created over the past decade by localities that have passed resolutions to limit their cooperation with federal enforcement of immigration laws. But sanctuaries have a deeper rooted history.
Sanctuaries arose in ancient Greece and Rome, where temples offered protection to fugitives from the law. Early Christian churches also served as sanctuaries, offering similar protections. Authorities would not desecrate a church by engaging in conflict or attempt to forcibly remove a wrongdoer from the sanctuary. Typically, the suspect would remain in the sanctuary until he could negotiate a solution, such as making restitution to an aggrieved party or agreeing to go into permanent exile. Over the years, the role of churches as sanctuaries steadily declined. In modern times, embassies often serve as similar sanctuaries.
What Does the Sanctuary Movement Mean for Gun Owners?
First, these “sanctuary” laws do nothing to prevent a local U.S. Attorney in your state from prosecuting you for a violation of federal law. On the other hand, the laws may not even be legally necessary; the right to keep and bear arms is expressly guaranteed by the Second Amendment, and the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed that such a right was fundamental in the Heller decision. District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008). In the event of any conflicts about Second Amendment rights, federal law supersedes state law and local ordinances. The Federal District Court in your state has the authority to determine whether any infringement on your firearm rights—local, state, or federal—is constitutional. Ultimately, any appeal of these issues will take place in the federal circuit courts and/or the U.S. Supreme Court.
Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions send a clear message to politicians: gun owners will not accept gun control laws that infringe on their constitutional rights. Only time will tell if the Second Amendment sanctuary movement will reduce or eliminate the restrictions and limits placed on law-abiding gun owners. Possibly, the movement will give cities and states an extra measure of protection for residents’ rights to keep and bear arms. Regardless of the Second Amendment sanctuary trend, the fact remains that your right to self-defense and to keep and bear arms is uniquely protected by the U.S. Constitution.
For more about Second Amendment sanctuaries and how they could impact your gun rights, contact U.S. LawShield and ask to speak to your Independent Program Attorney.
Your Protection Starts Here!
The information provided in this publication is intended to provide general information to individuals and is not legal advice. The information included in this publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication without the prior written consent of U.S. LawShield, to be given or withheld at our discretion. The information is not a substitute for, and does not replace the advice or representation of a licensed attorney. We strive to ensure the information included in this publication is accurate and current, however, no claim is made to the accuracy of the information and we are not responsible for any consequences that may result from the use of information in this publication. The use of this publication does not create an attorney-client relationship between U.S. LawShield, any independent program attorney, and any individual.
Why are the restrictions on owning or carrying weapons so different from State to state if the Federal Courts decide what is allowed? I can own pretty much what I want and carry with a license in Texas, but its impossible for the average pperson in other places like New York City?
Some politicians always think they can overstep their authority. It’s very clear that government is of enumerated powers, limited with good reason and has absolutely no Constitutional authority to limit or take rights period. Our second amendment only backs up our right and tells government this is off limits, “shall not be infringed”
Yet politicians ignore it, courts ignore it and look at precedent rather than our Constitution for guidance and insert their own personal beliefs.
Second amendment sanctuaries is yet another layer that isnt necessary but our 2nd amendment shouldn’t be necessary either since our constitution limits government to enumerated powers and gives them no authority in the first place.
What we truly need is TERM LIMITS, and office limits of 2.
If we want a fair government of the people, by the people and for the people we NEED to eliminate career politicians!
2 terms in any office, 2 offices and back to your life.
NO retirement, no benefits, just serve as public servant then back to your life, job, business.
An education system that teaches our constitution without liberal nonsense bias and twisted history.
Is it legal under the second amendment to impose taxes and fees for guns,ammo,magazine capacitys over a certain numer of rounds,(15,30 rounds or more)
The next infringement will be a federal tax on guns. This will make registration mandatory, and make it more difficult for persons who are not wealthy, to own and keep guns. Its an assault on both the poor, and the second amendment.
I strongly believe that belonging to the NRA is very important helps provide necessary funding to protect our 2nd Amendment Rights in the form of the NRA-ILA’s (Institute for Legislative Action) lawyers fighting legislative proposals and Anti-Gun Bills in D.C. Courts and Lobbying for Support of our Constitutional rights.
The NRA has been silent this whole year while infringement after infringement takes place. They are a disgrace to gun owners. Firearms Policy Coalition has done more this year than the NRA has done in the last decade. You should support them instead.
Second Amendment Sanctuary Zones are a requirement for the people’s freedom. Police response times are 7 to 10 minutes on average. In some areas of the country it’s more than that. In the meantime, home invasions involving 2 or more men has become the norm and the politicians couldn’t care less. Bottom line: we need to be able to protect ourselves, our family and anyone else being attacked, especially in these days of BLM, Antifa and emboldened criminals that won’t have to pay a dime for bail.
I support the right to bear arms and I believe that gun sanctuaries are a good idea.
Anything addeded to or removed from the actual originally written constitution is treasonous and should be treated as such.
All elected officials and appointed members of any government in any capacity is bound by law to defend our constitution and this we as citizens of this great nation are charged with making sure our government works for us and acts in the interest of safe guarding the public trust.